YFIS Discussion Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 23, 2012, 09:37:46 PM
25943 Posts in 5463 Topics by 6581 Members
Latest Member: Forex Expert Advisor Revi
Home Help Search Login Register
YFIS Discussion Board  |  General  |  Get Involved!  |  The Anti-War Movement Must Be Politically Independent Of The Pro-capitalist Parties « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: The Anti-War Movement Must Be Politically Independent Of The Pro-capitalist Parties  (Read 2638 times)
kinetikos
dissident
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 206

2


WWW
The Anti-War Movement Must Be Politically Independent Of The Pro-capitalist Parties
« Reply #15 on: September 29, 2003, 05:12:48 AM »

OOTN,

I found the book. I'm reading it. Of course the SEP (which broke from the WRP long ago) has their own take on this... as do all the other tendencies/sects/groups/whatevers.

The HOBM is truly a $#%^ mess, agreed.

We can investigate all of this stuff (and I'd be happy to if you would like to), or we can look at the things each of these groups are saying now and evaluate those things.

I find the wsws to be by far the best analysis I have come across -- having limited time, being human and all. But this doesn't mean I haven't found some things there troubling, especially lately with their entry/endorsement re the California recall... I think I've mentioned that somewhere here before.

Anyway, thanks for pointing me to the Grant/Sewell stuff.

Quote

Every Trotskyist sect is a sin. Why can't they just work together? Someone should arrange a "committee for the unification of the revolutionary Left" or something where all the sectarians could sit down and discuss their differences and arrive at agreements.


Well, that'd be nice, but it's kind of hard when you get knee-jerk reaction rather than a principled point by point discussion of the differences. No?

Quote

The workers can organise themselves into a class independent party only after they become class conscious, until then if you are to take the position of a communist your current task is to reach the masses with your revolutionary ideas and solutions. Calling for an independent party at this stage is madness, surely when you see 20+ other ‘workers parties’ shouting the same thing about their own group you would start to wake up and realise that?


Okay then you just let me know when the coast is clear. I wouldn't want to suggest that we start moving in that direction, oh no. Why that might get things going!

Quote

...taking up their independent political position as soon as possible by not allowing themselves to be misled by the hypocritical phrases of the democratic petty bourgeoisie into doubting for one minute the necessity of an independently organized party of the proletariat - Madness and Evil


Quote

surely when you see 20+ other ‘workers parties’ shouting the same thing about their own group you would start to wake up and realise that?


Surely if there are 20+ groups calling for the same thing then there is a strong call... and "what needs to be done" is that the groups each have their positions honesly looked at. To see, as des suggests, who is right and who is wrong and if the issues are so fundemental that there is "nothing that can be done"... also to see clearly who is absolutely full of shit and in it simply to prove they are right (the underlying symptom of a truly sectarian mind).
Logged

kinetikos
dissident
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 206

2


WWW
The Anti-War Movement Must Be Politically Independent Of The Pro-capitalist Parties
« Reply #16 on: September 30, 2003, 11:29:02 AM »

Quote

postscripts entitled "Programme for the International" on IDOM


Been reading this some. And, thanks again for setting me on it.

I am an American (USA) and there is no way that I know all the background re: British Trotskyism as well as many of you do... I see that there is quite a history full of splits and sabotage and resentment and the like. The "Grantites"(?) seem to really have some long standing problems with the "Healyites".

Now like I have said, this is all quite messy and, sadly, disheartening stuff. All I can say, from here, is  that I find the wsws and their analysis quite compelling. They've clearly broken with Healy at this point but I do understand that the break was long after the aforementioned backstory...  and I also can read quite plainly the inimical attitude that the SEP has towards any and all other groups. Of this there is no doubt, but they do explain their POV satisfactorily (IMO).

If anyone who would like to give me a short (or lengthy) pedigree of the current ICFI, I would appreciate it.

But, here I am, in Texas. I must try and take it from here on... I would really like to see an examination of the positions (or any one position) where the two camps differ theoretically.
Logged

kinetikos
dissident
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 206

2


WWW
The Anti-War Movement Must Be Politically Independent Of The Pro-capitalist Parties
« Reply #17 on: September 30, 2003, 11:32:10 AM »

Quote

I am an American (USA)


Oh, also I am kind of young to have had any chance to have followed this stuff back when it was happening.

But, funnily, I'm not especially "young". Didn't really know if I was supposed to be in here at first (YFIS) :D

Still, I couldn't stand another second trying to reason with American liberals. :eek:

So, I gotta say I'm happy to be here.
« Last Edit: September 30, 2003, 11:35:23 AM by 221 » Logged

OUTOFTHENIGHT
klaatu barada nikto
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 609

2


WWW
The Anti-War Movement Must Be Politically Independent Of The Pro-capitalist Parties
« Reply #18 on: September 30, 2003, 04:07:38 PM »

Kin .I appreciate your honesty over this subject. I think it quite off putting when you look at the Marxist left world wide and see so many split and sub splits , so many factions and personality cults  competing for position in this troubled world of ours. But ultimately as far as the Marxist left is concerned ,it is all about getting back to basics.Learning from mistakes and applying the correct method in guiding the forces to hand in the right direction.
Im sorry about the link , I should have showed you this straight away as it is a guide guide to the history of the SEP group.Of course there are other literary references and I can furnish you with them if you so desire.
The anti war movement has kind of reached a plateau; to me they seem to be lacking the decisive dirction to make them effective in challenging Capitalism.  This is because they fail to see the link of capitalism with war.Any anti capitalist sentiment is watered down by these people in order ,in their eyes to build support.They seem to subconsciencly saying "dont mention capitalism it will put people off from joining us". In the Uk  the Stop the WAr coalition has called on liberals and conservatives to join the movement.This popular front tactic will get nowhere especially when they try to link the fight against the war with industrial struggles (all linked, because most socalled marxist groups connect with trade union action). These non working class elements are a barrier to any growth and should not be include in the campaign.They benefit from capitalism, we dont.
The SEP group have been built on mistake after mistake .I really dont care to go into the ones I know but I have spoken to people , comrades in the Labour and Trade Union movement ,who dont necessary agree with me, who have experienced their tactics and in some cases hooliganism in persueing their aims. To me the fight against the war starts in the Trade Unions.From there you have to translate that expression into politics , and you do that through campaigning for trade union/socialist ideas in the Labour Party (Im giving you a UK perspective; I appreciate you live in Texas...I have never spoken to a Texan before!!)In the UK the Labour Party is the political experession of the Trade Unions, albeit with a pro capitalist leadership.Its the logical place to be.
Ian
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to: