YFIS Discussion Board
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
February 09, 2012, 07:12:38 AM
25943 Posts in 5463 Topics by 6582 Members
Latest Member: Forex Expert Advisor Revi
Home Help Search Login Register
YFIS Discussion Board  |  General  |  Politics and Current Events  |  the socialist theory needs to be enriched. « previous next »
Poll
Question: do you agree with the topic
yes
no
can't say

Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: the socialist theory needs to be enriched.  (Read 2686 times)
mohan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


the socialist theory needs to be enriched.
« on: March 19, 2010, 12:09:28 PM »

for socialism to succeed I believe there must be an enrichment in the theory.
the methodology of the organisations that are trying to bring socialism must suit the requirements of today.
The social ethos and way of thinking have changed since the days of classical socialism.
I believe the setback of socialism in different countries is chiefly due to the inadequacies of the organisational structures that were trying to run the socialist state.
The socialist party has to be modified a bit from the understandings of the 'leninist model' .
How that should be done I shall say later but I want to know the views of the readers on this matter first.

You know it is not the socialist economy that is failing.
It is the political aspect that needs enrichment . . .
The structure of the socialist/communist parties need to change.

thanks
« Last Edit: March 31, 2010, 12:20:38 AM by mohan » Logged
mohan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


Re: the theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2010, 12:13:44 PM »

this is serious discussion.
the setback of socialism is just because the theory has not been enriched with changing times.
what enrichment and enhancement is necessary is a matter of debate.
I request the readers to post their comments.
Logged
JJM 777
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 57


Re: the theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #2 on: March 19, 2010, 04:30:51 PM »

have the people you mentioned in your post created any open forum for free discussion and debate?
Have they openly discussed their model which they are trying to implement?

The other thread got locked, well it was in the wrong forum section, I wonder why it was not simply moved here and kept open.

I haven't hung aroung the ZNET folks much, because when I last checked (a year or two ago) they were maintaining some kind of a hierarchy where selected intellectuals had the right to make proposals, and paying subscribers had the right to make comments about the proposals somewhere, and non-paying people had the right to read but not comment anything.

http://www.zcommunications.org/

They might have changed their manners or then not, as I said I haven't checked their website in a year or two. I am on their mailing list (which is free, by the way), so I receive their news updates to my mailbox. This is what they wrote on 14 March 2010:



 
Hello,

This is the third draft of a future ZCom poll about joining or not joining an imagined new membership organization.

When we put this poll up online, it will aim to discover how much support such a new organization would attract.

Before that, however, we are sending it as an email to all ZCom Sustainers seeking your advice on improving it.

Regarding alterations, please don’t merely say that we should make it better, clearer, shorter. Instead, please participate more effectively. Please propose actual changes that you think would help.

Here is how it would appear, as of now, when made a live poll...

 

 

DRAFT THREE: An Organizational Poll

 

IMAGINE that a new organization is established in your country. Imagine it has a chapter where you live along with other chapters in your country and in many other countries. Imagine as well that it has the defining features listed below - and that it has no additional features you significantly dislike.

1. Supposing such an organization was launched, would you...

Be confident that with sufficient people and energy, the organization will have a positive impact.
Hope the organization will prove positive.
Fear the organization’s existence might do more harm than good.
Expect the organization’s existence will do more harm than good.
2. Given your feelings, would you:

Promptly join
Consider joining
Definitely not join
3.  If you were to join, how would you most likely relate to the organization

Give it considerable time, making it one of my priorities - including paying dues, participating in programs, trying to recruit, etc.
Give some time, I like the idea and support it, but have other priorities as well.
Have a wait and see attitude, hoping it would be worth my time, but waiting for evidence.
Expect to give little or no time, given all my other responsibilities and my expectation that my priorities would not change much, regardless of the organization’s growth and effectivity.
 

 

Here, then, are the defining features that the proposed organization hypothetically embodies. In light of these features, please answer the above questions...

 

Organizational Description

 

The organization, as some general priorities:

is anti capitalist, anti racist, anti sexist, and anti authoritarian and centrally addresses economics/class, politics, culture/race, kinship/gender, ecology, and international relations without privileging any one focus above the rest. 
seeks to transcend 20th Century market and centrally planned socialism.
flexibly explores and advocates long term vision sufficiently to inspire and orient current activity, but without seeking detailed blueprints that transcend needs and knowledge. 
sees social strategy as largely contingent on place and time and therefore continually seeks to revise shared views in light of new evidence, including regularly updating analysis, vision, and strategy.
 

The organization seeks a new political system that:

facilitates all citizens deliberating sufficiently to arrive at well-considered views and participate in decision-making.
utilizes transparent mechanisms to carry out and evaluate decisions.
conveys to all citizens a self managing say in legislative decisions proportionate to effects on them whether via grassroots assemblies/councils or communes and by way of various forms of direct participation or representation and delegation and/or voting options such as majority rule, some other voting algorithm, or consensus, etc., as needed to attain self management.
offers maximum civil liberties to all, including freedom of speech, press, religion, assembly, and organizing political parties and other organizations and facilitates and protects dissent.
promotes diversity so individuals and groups can pursue their own goals consistent with not interfering with the same rights accorded to others.
builds solidarity among people and fairly, peacefully, and constructively adjudicates disputes and violations of social norms and laws, seeking both justice and rehabilitation.
supports all community members contributing to solving problems and exploring possibilities to ensure that there are no political hierarchies that privilege some citizens over others.
 

The organization seeks a new economy such that:

no individuals or groups own the means of production (land, mines, factories, etc.) ensuring that ownership doesn’t impact anyone’s decision making influence or share of income.
payment for labor provides everyone morally fair shares of the social output and economically and socially effective incentives, including rejecting payment according to property, bargaining power, or the value of personal output, and instead establishing that workers who are able and who work longer at socially valued labor (including their own training) earn proportionately more for doing so; workers who work harder at socially valued labor earn proportionately more for doing so, and workers who work under more onerous conditions earn proportionately more for doing so, while those who are unable to work receive a full and fair share nonetheless.
there is no authoritarian workplace decision-making by any elite operating above the workforce and instead workers have a say in decisions to the extent possible, and over time, proportionate to effects on them, where this degree of say is sometimes best attained by majority rule, sometimes by consensus, or by other arrangements in accord with the characteristics of different types of decisions.
there is no corporate division of labor of the sort common to both capitalist and 20th century socialist economies in which roughly a fifth of the workforce do overwhelmingly empowering tasks and four fifths do overwhelmingly rote, repetitive, and, in any event, disempowering tasks - and, instead, each worker enjoys conditions of work suitable for him or her to be sufficiently confident, informed, and empowered to participate effectively in decision making, which includes having a socially average share of empowering tasks, whether this be accomplished by balanced job complexes or some other suitable new design of work.
allocation would not occur by market competition or top-down dictate, but instead by decentralized cooperative negotiation of inputs and outputs consistent with self-management, whether this be accomplished by participatory planning by workers and consumers councils, or by some other suitable methods for addressing both day to day outcomes and longer term investment choices, as well.
 

 

The organization seeks gender and kin relations for a new society that:

seek to eliminate hierarchies of reward of influence based on gender or sexual preference
do not privilege certain types of family formation over others but instead actively support all types of families that are consistent with society’s other broad norms and practices. 
promote children’s well-being and affirm society’s responsibility for all its children, at the same time as affirming the right of diverse types of families to have children and to provide them with love and a sense of rootedness and belonging.
minimize or eliminate the use of age-based designations, preferring non-arbitrary means for determining when an individual is old enough, or young enough, to participate in certain economic, political or other activities, or to receive certain benefits/privileges.
respect marriage and other lasting relations among adults as religious, cultural, or social practices, but reject the idea of legal marriage as a way to gain financial benefits or social status.
respect care giving as a socially valuable function including ensuring that it doesn’t disproportionately fall on women, including making care giving a part of every citizen’s social responsibilities or other worthy means to ensure equity.
affirm diverse expressions of sexual pleasure, personal identity, and mutual intimacy while ensuring that each person honors the autonomy, humanity, and rights of others.
provide diverse, empowering education about sex, as about all social relations including legal prohibitions against any kind of non-consensual sex. 
 

The organization seeks ecological relations that:

account for the full ecological (and social/personal) costs and benefits of both short and long term economic and social choices, so that future populations can make informed choices about levels of production and consumption, duration of work, self reliance, energy use and harvesting, husbandry, pollution, climate policies, conservation, consumption, and other aims and activities as part of their freely made decisions about future policies.
foster a consciousness of ecological connection and responsibility so that future citizens are well prepared to decide policies regarding animal rights, vegetarianism, or other policies that transcend sustainability and even husbandry, consistently with their ecological preferences and their broader agendas for other social and economic functions, as they freely decide for themselves in future settings. 
 

The organization seeks cultural and community relations that:

ensure that people can have multiple cultural and social identities, including providing the space and resources necessary for people to positively express their identities, while recognizing as well that which identity is most important to any particular person at any particular time will depend on that person’s situation and assessments.
explicitly recognize that rights and values exist regardless of cultural identity, so that all people deserve self management, equity, solidarity, and liberty, and so that while society protects all people’s right to affiliate freely and fosters diversity, its core values are universal.
guarantee free entry and exit to and from all cultural communities in society including affirming that communities that do have free entry and exit can be under the complete self determination of their members, so long as their policies and actions don't conflict with society's laws.
 

The organization seeks international relations such that:

international institutions put an end to imperialism in all its forms including colonialism, neo colonialism, neo liberalism, etc. 
international institutions are internationalist in that they diminish economic disparities in countries’ relative wealth while also protecting cultural and social patterns interior to each country from external violation and facilitating international entwinement and ties as people desire.
 

The organization’s broad action agenda or program, while of course regularly updated and adapted, nonetheless always:

seeks to incorporate seeds of the future in its present projects at least regarding class, race, gender, sexual, age, and power relations, both in the ways members act as well as by actively building institutions that represent the values of the movement and which the organization can present as liberating alternatives to the status quo it combats. 
seeks to constantly grow support and membership among the class, nationality, and gender constituencies it claims to aid.
seeks to learn from and seek unity with audiences far wider than its own membership, including emphasizing attracting younger generations and affirmatively empowering younger members and of course participating in, supporting, building, and aiding diverse social movements and struggles.
seeks changes in society both for citizens to enjoy immediately, and also to establish by the terms of its victories and even more so by the means used in its organizing, a likelihood that citizens will pursue and win more change in the future. 
seeks to connect efforts, resources, and lessons across continents and from country to country, even as it also recognizes that strategies suitable to different places, and times will differ. 
seeks short term changes by its own actions and programs and by support of larger movements and projects as its affected members decide, both internationally and by country and also locally, including addressing global warming, arms control, war and peace, the level and composition of economic output, agricultural relations, education, health care, income distribution, duration of work, gender roles, racial relations, media, law, legislation, etc., as its members choose. 
seeks to develop mechanisms that provide financial, legal, employment, and emotional support to its members so that its members can be in a better position to participate as fully as they wish and negotiate the various challenges and sometimes negative effects of taking part in radical actions.
works to substantially improve the life situations of its members, including aiding their feelings of self worth, their knowledge, skills, and confidence, their mental, physical, sexual, and spiritual health, and even their social ties and engagements and leisure enjoyments.
sets up internal structures and defines its action agenda to facilitate everyone’s participation in the organization, including, when possible, offering childcare at meetings and events, finding ways to reach out to those who might be immersed in kinship duties, and aiding those with busy work schedules due to multiple jobs, monitoring and responding to sexism, racism, classism, and homophobia as they may be manifested internally, and having diverse roles in projects suitable to people with different situations. 
seeks means to develop, debate, disseminate, and advocate truthful news, analysis, vision, and strategy among its members and also in the wider society, including developing and sustaining needed media and means of face to face communication.
uses diverse methods of agitation and struggle from educational efforts to rallies and marches, to demonstrations, boycotts, strikes, and direct actions, to win gains and build movements.
places a very high burden of proof on utilizing violence, including cultivating a decidedly non violent attitude. 
assesses engaging in electoral politics case by case, including cultivating a very cautious electoral attitude. 
 

The organization’s structure and policy:

seeks to be internally classless and self-managing including structuring itself so that a minority who are initially disproportionately endowed with needed skills, information, and confidence do not form a formal or an informal decision-making hierarchy, leaving less prepared members to follow orders or perform only rote tasks.
strives to implement the self management norm that "each member has say proportional to the degree they are effected" in its decision-making structures. 
guarantees groups of members rights to organize “currents” and guarantees these “currents” full rights of democratic debate.
welcomes and even celebrates internal debate and dissent, making room, as possible, for contrary views to exist and be tested alongside preferred views.
respects diversity, so that continental, national, regional, city, and local chapters can respond to their own circumstances and implement their own programs so long as their choices do not interfere with the shared goals and principles of the organization as a whole or with other local groups addressing their own situations.
provides extensive opportunities for people to participate in organizational decision making, including engaging in deliberation with others so as to arrive at the most well-considered decisions and also implementing mechanisms for carrying out collective decisions and for the membership to assure that the decisions have been carried out correctly.
strives to provide transparency regarding any actions by elected or delegated leaders with a high burden of proof for secreting any agenda to avoid repression or for any other reason.
provides the membership with a mechanism to recall any leaders or representatives who the members believe are not adequately representing them.
provides internal means for fairly, peacefully, constructively - and non destructively - resolving internal disputes.
apportions empowering and disempowering tasks among its members to ensure that no individuals control the organization by having a relative monopoly on information or position.
expects its members to participate in the life of the organization actively, including taking collective responsibility for it and presenting a unified voice in action.
incorporates its members in developing, debating, and deciding on proposals, and treats lack of participation as a serious problem to be addressed whenever it surfaces.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2010, 04:35:31 PM by JJM 777 » Logged
Pie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 21


Re: the theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #3 on: March 20, 2010, 03:09:46 AM »

mohan: I think the theory is there, but the conditions are not.
You're spot on that socialism's current setbacks are due to "inadequacies of organisational structures" i.e. bureaucratic leadership. In the USSR, they barely lifted a finger to spread revolution and eventually sold out the country in 1990/91. In the GDR, they let West Germany annex them. It is the same now in the unions; over the past half-century the capitalists have been quite successful in "bribing" workers out of unions, making the unions very weak. And in the past few years during this crisis, the unions could have made great gains in organizing the working class and combating the capitalists; but instead now what's often happening are the union bosses telling the workers to give up on any fight for jobs or wages or benefits and that the best we can do is vote for the Democrats and maybe "bargain" in better times. During the Great Depression, unions made great strides in organization and strikes were pretty common, now union membership is still dropping, last year the unions lost some 770,000 members. And as for socialist parties, here in the US, they are dismal; there are lots of them, but I don't find any leadership in any of them. From what I've seen of them, they either just advocate some sort of childish things about how we need "drop out" of capitalist society and the most important thing in the world is gay rights ( and I think don't like the working class much) or they just trail the Democrats; anyways I think all of them are too much infected with liberals. The CPUSA has a tragic history, during the 1930s I think they boasted having 100,000 members; now they are down to a tiny fraction of that and are just cheerleaders for the democrats, and not even the more "left-wing" section, but its "right-wing." Their class composition isn't very good either, I think it was one of their articles I read a few years ago bragging about how many professors were in the party.

Anyways the draft JJM posted is definately not the way not the to enrich communist theory. It seems to me a mashing of abstractions. It is highly utopian, and returning to the utopians would return us to pre-Marx. It would bring us, theoretically, backwards to the late 18th/early 19th centuries. Even then this draft is different, the utopians were progressive then, now they are regressive. And this draft is inferior even more because at least the utopian colonies did work for some time based on a plan; I can't make heads or tails of this draft and how it would work. To me it just contains some smatterings about how some "organization" would be "classless, anti-authoritarian, blah blah blah" and seems contradictory in places. The whole thing is a pile of garbage.
Logged
Paula Marx
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 73



Re: the theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #4 on: March 20, 2010, 05:45:47 AM »

I think theory and conditions are either in the big trouble. There is no two same understandings, so is it possible to reach the collectivity? Or is it only about broad masses and their naivete? Should we show our theory or our real plans for future? Are there real plans?

I agree with Mohan in some facts, but I think we sold our country a lot before, not in 1991, and the same for USSR. I don't think there was a real socialism, but it could reach it if the people were more patient. And now we come to the endless circle. They weren't patient because that wasn't a real socialism.
Logged

Eviva'l communismo e la liberta!
mohan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


Re: the theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2010, 09:22:29 AM »

thanks for the serious and prompt replies

I am going through the draft. It will take some time before I comment on it.

I agree to both Pie and Paula and appreciate the pointed contents in your discussions.
call it theory or conditions. we agree that change is necessary.
the leadership in USSR, something was wrong with them, same in Germany, in other European states, in China, elsewhere.
And so the setback of socialism.

if we say theory is OK, conditions have changed, doesn't it imply, that the theory has become inadequate with the changing conditions.
Since Marxism is not a dogma, but a guide to action, so condition changes, the theories need to be enriched.

you have correctly pointed out the problems in parties and other labor organizations round the globe.
you know what, there is a common problem everywhere.
when the leadership falters, the rank and file struggles and tries to fight against the leadership.
now the structure of the parties are such that only if the leaders allow these criticisms, only then the voice of the rank and file
finds way through and succeeds in eradicating malice.
for this the leaders must be like Lenin, who was true to revolution and was ready to accept criticism anytime.
now the conditions are changed and in these conditions we can hardly expect leaders like Lenin.
we all are fighting too hard against individualism in us and still it manifests in some or the other forms.
so now when a member from the rank and file criticizes he is isolated by the leadership and he can't do much because the
organizational structure doesn't allow him to do anything.
those fighting for revolution have to consider this point.
if someone from the rank and file falters, not much harm is done.
but if the leaders become victims of reformism, revisionism, and other bad trends as you have mentioned then
the party, the organization can no longer fulfill its goal.

I feel the structure of the Leninist model of communist party must be enriched to prevent these problems.
What do you say?

Logged
Paula Marx
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 73



Re: the theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2010, 06:21:22 AM »

I don't think it's very important to be just like Lenin, but he has some qualities a good leader needs, even I'm not a Bolshevik.
He knew how to get the broad masses and that's why the revolution succeeded, even he wasn't alive long enough to reach another stages of communism. We can't allow that to happen again, we have to think forward. Stalin destroyed USSR and Leninism, which could happen again.I don't say Leninism was good, but it was surely better than Stalinism.
We can't only do the revolution or something before analyzing possibilities which could happen.
Logged

Eviva'l communismo e la liberta!
mohan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


Re: the theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2010, 11:15:09 AM »

It is not the point of becoming a Lenin.
The point is total commitment to revolution.
That character is essential for every leader.
Without total commitment to revolution, one can never rise above personal self interests and can't truly lead a revolution.
Even if they somehow usurp power, they won't be able to hold it for long.
All sorts of individualism will destroy everything as it has done in the USSR and other places.
What I meant to say is that individualism is now a greater threat as capitalism has totally become reactionary and has lost all its progressive character.
Hence the organisations that lead the working class must in all possible ways have means to fight against individualistic trends of the leaders if they happen to surface.
One may disagree with Lenin but his commitment to the cause of revolution is undisputed.
I hope Paula will agree. 
Logged
Paula Marx
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 73



Re: the theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #8 on: March 23, 2010, 07:49:18 AM »

Well, half-half, I'd say.
I agree leaders shouldn't follow trends and should know how to deal with broad masses, but I think individuality and authority are very important for a good leadership.
Every member of revolution must have his opinions and must know how to say them without insulting his comrades, but must have full trust in everyone else.
Logged

Eviva'l communismo e la liberta!
mohan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


Re: the theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #9 on: March 23, 2010, 12:19:30 PM »

When Marx raised the slogan -  'Workers of the world unite', he also said - "The workers who will change the world will have to change themselves first"
What he meant by this very statement is to get rid of all sorts of capitalistic tendencies within us and adopt the culture of collectivism which is truly the culture of the working class.
Socialism is a philosophy that exhorts the submission of the individual interest to the social interest and this culture has to be adopted by those who are fighting for socialism.
By adopting collectivism and fighting against individualism one does not lose qualities of leadership or self confidence.
but instead the collective leadership of the entire organization manifests through him.
Lenin who led the first successful socialist revolution also said - "cultural revolution precedes technical revolution and follows for long after that."
When he said this he also stressed on adopting a socialist culture which is based on collectivism and to get rid of individualism which is the product of capitalism"
Even in China Mao who successfully led the revolution stressed upon the 'cultural revolution'.
This is more essential for the leaders because individualism in them can cause serious harm to the organisation and the cause of the revolution.
here when I say individualism I mean individual trends and interests. I don't mean individual initiative.
Individual initiative is just a reflection of the sense of social responsibilities and hence is collective in nature.

The organisation of the working class should be such in my opinion that should allow the rank and file to fight and bring down the leadership if necessary.
Because it is the leadership's deviation from the path of revolution that is causing all troubles everywhere.
And in revolutionary organisations, nowadays that are mostly built on the model of the Bolshevik party of Russia or the communist party of china,  the conditions are such that the rank and file do not get an opportunity to fight if the leadership falters.
 
Logged
mohan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


Re: the theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #10 on: March 30, 2010, 11:58:15 PM »

I went through the draft.
I feel the people should have some more experience on actual problems that come up in a revolutionary organisation.
nevertheless it seems that the intentions are good and if they move ahead with open minds they can move forward quickly.
Sorry for the delay in posting the reply.
Logged
mohan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


Re: the socialist theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #11 on: March 31, 2010, 12:21:05 AM »

I feel we have strayed a bit away from the topic which we started earlier.

We were discussing on the need to enrich the socialist theory.

The theory of Scientific socialism as propounded by Marx was in due course of time enriched by many.
Enriched in the sense - when the theory was put into practice to bring about social change, it had to be concretised and in the process enriched.
Marx himself held the opinion that the socialist theory is not a dogma but a guide to action.
And since truth is always concrete precise and relative, so as things around us change, the theories are to be enriched so that we can use it in the changed circumstances.

Now where are these changes necessary?

For that we need to scritinise the shortcomings of different socialist orders.
The socialist nations had succeeded in eradicating nearly all kinds of misery.
They had ensured food, shelter clothing, education, employment for all.
They had restored the esteem and self respect of the working class.
In a capitalist society there is no guarantee in any sphere of life.
But in a socialist country man was fast advancing towards become a truly emancipated being.


but then things started going wrong!
what things were going wrong?
why the setback of socialism.
what lessons do we have to learn?

These are the intentions of my discussion.
Logged
mohan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


Re: the socialist theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #12 on: April 29, 2010, 09:55:23 AM »

We need to establish why there was a setback of socialism in the Soviet Union and the European countries.
Till today there hasn't been a better social order.
Please post your views.
Logged
Paula Marx
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 73



Re: the socialist theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #13 on: April 30, 2010, 06:08:22 AM »

I wouldn't say the USSR communism was good. It was really bad actually and it's sad communism hasn't reached any better stage.
We have to learn from their mistakes.
The main thing that was wrong is - Bolshevism. Bolsheviks, especially Stalinists, have worked against real ideals and made a terror in the USSR. They reduced human rights and the right of opinion - things they should mainly fight for.
Logged

Eviva'l communismo e la liberta!
mohan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


Re: the socialist theory needs to be enriched.
« Reply #14 on: May 17, 2010, 12:19:46 PM »


There may have been shortcomings.
But there is no doubt about the fact that the Soviet Union was successful in providing the basic amenities  for all citizens.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to: