Science & Socialism

[ACE]

How can Scientific advances also further the cause of Socialism?  Put simlpy it's essential to then final success of Socialism.  Imperialism is based on control over the resorces, means of production, general wealth of a nation and control over the will of the population.  How can we use ground breaking science to over throw imperialists?  Well people have been brain wished by imperialist to support capitalist ideas by way of cultivating in them love of money.  Well what's money though?  Well Money it turns out is only a form of propaganda, it's ceased to be an actual tangible thing in most cases, no longer is it represented by gold or precious metals or any of those things, no now a days the majority or atleast huge portions are represented as figures in banking computers, and yet despite it's radicle change from what it's been thought human history people still lust for it.  Well why is that?  You all understand how people hold materialistic desire, status as inferred by ones possession, I.E. you own an expensive Hummer then that makes you a BETTER person, or so that materialistic reasoning goes, let's not even talk about how these expensive fancy cars are actually a means of overcompensating for sexual inadiquatcy.  But back to topic, the materialistic philosphy is that I'm better then you because I own Luxaries X, Y & Z.  Yes in the mind of the materalistic capitist said Luxaries makes me better then you, that's the propaganda from which the love of money stems.  So how the science come into play in overturning their way of thinking?  Well the idea that an excessively expensive luxary vechicle as been the symbol of status and substitute for sexual verility is also based on it's being scarce and difficult to obtain.  Here's where the science comes in, under a commmunist state such scarcity becomes a thing of the past.  I've spoken before about how things such as electricity can all be obtained and made FREE for all, no longer do humans have to slaughter one another for oil drilled out of the ground, the technology exsists for all human kind's engery needs to be filled, and where energy needs are met so to can manufacturing needs be met as we also have the technology to manufacuture most human consumable good with automation.  So these two key piece of the puzzle are essential, free energy and free manufacturing through automation of production.  You can from from a world where the luxuary Hummers of todays capitalist are now availible to be used by every human living on the face of the earth.  The Technicle obsticles to said world have ALREADY been over come the only remaining obsticle is the propaganda of materialistic Capitalist and their greed that is based on scarcity.

[roodzwijntje]

Please cut your text a bit down into paragraphs, this is tiring to read...

[ACE]

alright didn't realize that the way I write could be hard to follow.  I'll try and be more aware of that.

[ACE]

Refreshing

[Vespucci]

There's no need to refresh these threads unless you've something more to add. Furthermore, these posts are structured more as lectures than discussions; if you want people to reply, it's better to ask for opinions or to approach the issue as a debating point rather than as educational material.

[ACE]

You sound as though you'd rather not hear the solutions to the world's problems.  I beg to differ regarding the relavence of this text regarding how it can lead to solutions for both Communism and the state of being for the world in generial.  I Refreshed the text because of the 30 or so views it received since it was refreshed two days ago.  These Views are significant as the more people who become aware that there are solutions to be had the more people will Clamour for those solutions to be implimented.  Surely you can understand this....

[Vespucci]

If you want to keep a thread on top, add more to it or wait for others to do so.

[ACE]

I suppose it must be because I have a passion about solving this problem I'm even interested in the viewing done by the passive web surfer who might read the text but not actually reply to it.  I also suspect that people might be shy about asking a question regarding what was written as it might expose a lack of understanding of the topic.  I'm not at all happy with that type of shyness as the only dumb question is the question that is left unasked.